Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) and UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) are Value Fund, Equity schemes. Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) is 17 yrs 1 m old and manages ₹8,918.8 Crs, whereas UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) is 13 yrs 4 m old with ₹9,433 Crs.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) is older, but UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) is larger — suggesting that while Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) has more experience, UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) may be attracting recent investor interest.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) has its top 3 sectors in Banks (26.43%), Consumer Durables (9.18%), and Finance (7.96%), while UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) focuses on Banks (28.99%), IT - Software (7.86%), and Automobile (6.92%).
• The funds share exposure to Banks, but differ in the rest, which means they will partially move together but may diverge depending on how the unique sectors perform.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) holds HDFC Bank Limited (7.48%), NTPC Limited (4.89%), State Bank of India (4.81%), IndusInd Bank Limited (3.69%), and Axis Bank Limited (3.32%), whereas UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) holds HDFC BANK LIMITED (8.34%), ICICI BANK LTD (5.76%), BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. (4.40%), AXIS BANK LTD. (3.70%), and STATE BANK OF INDIA (3.68%).
• The funds share exposure to HDFC Bank Limited and State Bank of India, which makes their performance partly correlated. However, the unique holdings like NTPC Limited in Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) and ICICI BANK LTD in UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) can create divergence depending on how these stocks perform.
• In terms of risk profile, Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) has 99.48% equity and 0.00% debt, while UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) has 98.64% equity and 0.27% debt.
• Risk profile is similar for both funds.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) outperformed UTI-Value Fund - Direct (IDCW) in 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: 18.82%, 16.88% ) but underperformed in 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year (returns: -5.74%, -7.01%, -0.64%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.