Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) and Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) are Value Fund, Equity schemes. Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) is 17 yrs 1 m old and manages ₹8,918.8 Crs, whereas Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) is 10 yrs 8 m old with ₹66.85 Crs.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) is therefore older and larger, which may indicate more experience and investor confidence.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) has its top 3 sectors in Banks (26.43%), Consumer Durables (9.18%), and Finance (7.96%), while Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) focuses on Banks (24.14%), Pharmaceuticals (7.24%), and Finance (6.73%).
• The funds share exposure to Banks and Finance, but differ in the rest, which means they will partially move together but may diverge depending on how the unique sectors perform.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) holds HDFC Bank Limited (7.48%), NTPC Limited (4.89%), State Bank of India (4.81%), IndusInd Bank Limited (3.69%), and Axis Bank Limited (3.32%), whereas Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) holds HDFC Bank Limited (5.86%), TREPS 04-MAY-2026 (5.76%), ICICI Bank Limited (5.11%), State Bank of India (5.03%), and Bharti Airtel Limited (4.53%).
• The funds share exposure to HDFC Bank Limited and State Bank of India, which makes their performance partly correlated. However, the unique holdings like NTPC Limited in Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) and TREPS 04-MAY-2026 in Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) can create divergence depending on how these stocks perform.
• In terms of risk profile, Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) has 99.48% equity and 0.00% debt, while Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) has 91.46% equity and 0.00% debt.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) is more aggressive with higher equity allocation, which could lead to higher returns but more volatility.
• Nippon India Value Fund (IDCW) outperformed Groww Value Fund - Direct (G) in 3 Months, 6 Months, 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: -5.74%, -7.01%, 18.82%, 16.88% ) but underperformed in 1 Year (returns: -0.64%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.