Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) and Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) are Sectoral / Thematic, Equity schemes. Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) is 18 yrs 6 m old and manages ₹1,369.78 Crs, whereas Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) is 18 yrs 6 m old with ₹1,369.78 Crs.
• Both funds are fairly comparable in terms of age and size.
• Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) has its top 3 sectors in Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment (18.30%), Infrastructure Developers & Operators (12.58%), and Aerospace & Defence (8.38%), while Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) focuses on Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment (18.30%), Infrastructure Developers & Operators (12.58%), and Aerospace & Defence (8.38%).
• Both funds have identical top sector allocations, so sector-level performance will likely impact them similarly.
• Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) holds Honeywell Automation India Limited (7.45%), Larsen & Toubro Limited (6.39%), Hitachi Energy India Limited (4.76%), Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited (4.07%), and ABB India Limited (4.05%), whereas Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) holds Honeywell Automation India Limited (7.45%), Larsen & Toubro Limited (6.39%), Hitachi Energy India Limited (4.76%), Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited (4.07%), and ABB India Limited (4.05%).
• Both funds share identical top holdings, meaning their performance will be very similar and primarily differ based on portfolio weight distribution.
• In terms of risk profile, Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) has 95.15% equity and 0.00% debt, while Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) has 95.15% equity and 0.00% debt.
• Risk profile is similar for both funds.
• Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (G) outperformed Invesco India Infrastructure Fund (IDCW) in 1 Year (returns: 1.87% ) but underperformed in 3 Months, 6 Months, 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: -6.78%, -11.07%, 20.00%, 19.35%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.