Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) and Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) are Large Cap Fund, Equity schemes. ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) is 13 yrs 3 m old and manages ₹77,451.59 Crs, whereas Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) is 8 yrs 11 m old with ₹453.03 Crs.
• ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) is therefore older and larger, which may indicate more experience and investor confidence.
• ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) has its top 3 sectors in Banks (24.84%), Automobile (10.78%), and Refineries (6.89%), while Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) focuses on Banks (26.82%), Finance (7.36%), and Automobile (7.00%).
• The funds share exposure to Banks and Automobile, but differ in the rest, which means they will partially move together but may diverge depending on how the unique sectors perform.
• ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) holds ICICI Bank Ltd. (9.42%), HDFC Bank Ltd. (9.16%), Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (6.34%), Reliance Industries Ltd. (5.98%), and TREPS (4.84%), whereas Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) holds ICICI Bank Ltd. (8.84%), HDFC Bank Ltd. (7.64%), Reliance Industries Ltd. (5.54%), State Bank of India (5.33%), and Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (4.06%).
• The funds share exposure to ICICI Bank Ltd. and HDFC Bank Ltd., which makes their performance partly correlated. However, the unique holdings like TREPS in ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) and State Bank of India in Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) can create divergence depending on how these stocks perform.
• In terms of risk profile, ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) has 92.25% equity and 2.80% debt, while Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) has 98.80% equity and 0.06% debt.
• Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) is more aggressive with higher equity allocation, which could lead to higher returns but more volatility.
• ICICI Pru Large Cap Fund - Direct (G) outperformed Union Largecap Fund - Regular (G) in 3 Months, 1 Year (returns: -11.87%, 2.40% ) but underperformed in 6 Months, 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: -7.83%, 15.04%, 14.56%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.