Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) and Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) are Sectoral / Thematic, Equity schemes. ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) is 6 yrs 6 m old and manages ₹3,677.09 Crs, whereas Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) is 2 yrs 10 m old with ₹968.94 Crs.
• ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) is therefore older and larger, which may indicate more experience and investor confidence.
• ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) has its top 3 sectors in Steel (30.45%), Chemicals (16.25%), and Mining & Mineral products (9.14%), while Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) focuses on Finance (19.71%), Auto Ancillaries (10.51%), and Power Generation & Distribution (9.18%).
• The funds are completely different in sector allocation, which could result in very different performance patterns based on sector trends.
• ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) holds Jindal Steel Ltd. (9.48%), Vedanta Ltd. (8.93%), JSW Steel Ltd. (7.51%), Jindal Stainless Ltd. (5.97%), and UPL Ltd. (5.18%), whereas Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) holds TREPS 02-Mar-2026 DEPO 10 (18.46%), Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd (10.51%), HDFC Bank Limited (9.51%), Adani Green Energy Limited (9.18%), and HDFC Life Insurance Co Ltd (8.97%).
• The funds have completely different top holdings, which means their performance could diverge significantly depending on which stocks or sectors lead the market.
• In terms of risk profile, ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) has 89.56% equity and 0.03% debt, while Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) has 73.41% equity and 6.56% debt.
• ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) is more aggressive with higher equity allocation, which could lead to higher returns but more volatility.
• ICICI Pru Commodities Fund (G) outperformed Quant Business Cycle Fund - Regular (G) in 3 Months, 1 Year (returns: -5.81%, 11.39% ) but underperformed in 6 Months, 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: -0.44%, 17.77%, 19.34%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.