Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) and Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) are Sectoral / Thematic, Equity schemes. Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) is 27 yrs 7 m old and manages ₹1,670.19 Crs, whereas Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) is 11 yrs 2 m old with ₹1,107.07 Crs.
• Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) is therefore older and larger, which may indicate more experience and investor confidence.
• Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) has its top 3 sectors in IT - Software (46.42%), Telecom-Service (18.36%), and E-Commerce/App based Aggregator (11.54%), while Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) focuses on Automobile (11.79%), Auto Ancillaries (10.13%), and Pharmaceuticals (9.94%).
• The funds are completely different in sector allocation, which could result in very different performance patterns based on sector trends.
• Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) holds Bharti Airtel Ltd (18.36%), Infosys Ltd (16.27%), HCL Technologies Ltd (7.44%), Eternal Ltd (6.67%), and Franklin Technology Fund, Class I (Acc) (5.99%), whereas Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) holds Hindalco Industries Limited (5.01%), Reliance Industries Limited (4.62%), Mahindra & Mahindra Limited (4.44%), Maruti Suzuki India Limited (4.14%), and Cummins India Limited (3.79%).
• The funds have completely different top holdings, which means their performance could diverge significantly depending on which stocks or sectors lead the market.
• In terms of risk profile, Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) has 77.72% equity and 0.00% debt, while Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) has 98.92% equity and 0.00% debt.
• Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) is more aggressive with higher equity allocation, which could lead to higher returns but more volatility.
• Franklin India Technology Fund - (IDCW) outperformed Aditya Birla SL Manufacturing Equity Fund (G) over the long term (5 Years , return: 9.11% ), but recent periods (3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, 3 Years, returns: -19.48%, -13.76%, -7.49%, 13.90%) lagged behind. This may offer a favorable entry point for patient investors focusing on long-term growth.