Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) and Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) are Sectoral / Thematic, Equity schemes. Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) is 13 yrs 3 m old and manages ₹3,173.61 Crs, whereas Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) is 13 yrs 3 m old with ₹2,014.32 Crs.
• Both funds are fairly comparable in terms of age and size.
• Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) has its top 3 sectors in Infrastructure Developers & Operators (12.21%), Banks (12.15%), and Power Generation & Distribution (11.82%), while Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) focuses on Power Generation & Distribution (16.13%), Infrastructure Developers & Operators (14.85%), and Cement (11.77%).
• The funds share exposure to Infrastructure Developers & Operators and Power Generation & Distribution, but differ in the rest, which means they will partially move together but may diverge depending on how the unique sectors perform.
• Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) holds Larsen & Toubro Ltd (8.96%), Interglobe Aviation Ltd (6.39%), Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd (6.02%), Reliance Industries Ltd (5.53%), and NTPC Ltd (4.79%), whereas Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) holds LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. (7.43%), NTPC Ltd. (4.41%), THE RAMCO CEMENTS LTD. (3.90%), ADANI PORTS AND SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE LTD. (3.47%), and REPO (2.98%).
• The funds share exposure to Larsen & Toubro Ltd and NTPC Ltd, which makes their performance partly correlated. However, the unique holdings like Interglobe Aviation Ltd in Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) and THE RAMCO CEMENTS LTD. in Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) can create divergence depending on how these stocks perform.
• In terms of risk profile, Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) has 96.56% equity and 0.00% debt, while Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) has 94.20% equity and 0.00% debt.
• Risk profile is similar for both funds.
• Franklin Build India Fund - Direct (G) outperformed Tata Infrastructure Fund - Direct (G) in 1 Year, 3 Years, 5 Years (returns: 9.66%, 25.56%, 23.81% ) but underperformed in 3 Months, 6 Months (returns: -5.22%, -3.36%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.