Compare Mutual Funds

Insights from Fund Comparison

• Both DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) and AXIS Value Fund (G) are Value Fund, Equity schemes. DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) is 5 yrs 6 m old and manages ₹1,702.98 Crs, whereas AXIS Value Fund (G) is 4 yrs 8 m old with ₹1,523.46 Crs.
• Both funds are fairly comparable in terms of age and size.
• DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) has its top 3 sectors in Automobile (7.04%), Pharmaceuticals (6.12%), and IT - Software (6.03%), while AXIS Value Fund (G) focuses on Banks (22.93%), Finance (6.64%), and IT - Software (6.03%).
• The funds share exposure to IT - Software, but differ in the rest, which means they will partially move together but may diverge depending on how the unique sectors perform.
• DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) holds TREPS / Reverse Repo Investments (11.29%), Net Receivables/Payables (5.03%), Bharti Airtel Limited (3.47%), Reliance Industries Limited (3.30%), and Larsen & Toubro Limited (3.16%), whereas AXIS Value Fund (G) holds Clearing Corporation of India Ltd (6.04%), ICICI Bank Limited (5.31%), HDFC Bank Limited (4.62%), Reliance Industries Limited (4.30%), and State Bank of India (3.39%).
• The funds share exposure to Reliance Industries Limited, which makes their performance partly correlated. However, the unique holdings like TREPS / Reverse Repo Investments in DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) and Clearing Corporation of India Ltd in AXIS Value Fund (G) can create divergence depending on how these stocks perform.
• In terms of risk profile, DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) has 55.89% equity and 0.00% debt, while AXIS Value Fund (G) has 94.14% equity and 0.00% debt.
• AXIS Value Fund (G) is more aggressive with higher equity allocation, which could lead to higher returns but more volatility.
• DSP Value Fund - Direct (G) outperformed AXIS Value Fund (G) in 3 Months, 6 Months, 3 Years (returns: 1.76%, 3.68%, 20.24% ) but underperformed in 1 Year, 5 Years (returns: 12.22%, 15.25%). This mixed performance indicates strength in certain market cycles while highlighting periods of relative weakness, suggesting selective timing or careful monitoring may be needed.